When reading “The Things They Carried,” the eponymous
chapter of Tim O’Brien’s narrative on the Vietnam War, I could not help but
compare it to the last war novel that I read: Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front, which
details the German side of trench warfare during the First World War. Both
books are written with a beautiful command of the English language. Though both
books are similar, they feel different. Particularly, I noticed the different
ways that each story approached the issue of bravery in the face of war.
In All Quiet, the
main character, Paul Bäumer, makes it no secret that war is terrifying and that
being afraid is perfectly natural. He even reacts with complete understanding
and sympathy when a young recruit soils himself during an attack. The soldiers,
he noted, were carried on by duty and obligation to Germany. When they died, it
was tragedy wrought by a pointless war waged by faceless higher-ups. In The Things They Carried, however, O’Brien
seems to offer a different perspective. According to him, “They carried the
soldier’s greatest fear, which was the fear of blushing. Men killed, and died,
because they were embarrassed not to.” These men seem not to be carried by a loyalty
to the United States, but rather out of a sense of wanting to appear brave and
in control. They do not want to let this war get the better of them, because
they feel that that would make them weak. They belittle cowardice, when in fact
fear dwells within them all.
It is also important to consider the backgrounds of both
wars when comparing these two works. The soldiers of World War I did join the
army out of a sense of duty to the nation. As time went on, they began to grow
disillusioned and ask why they must fight men that they had no personal qualms
with. The Vietnam War, however, was unpopular from the start. Men who never
even dreamed of being in the army, men who did not even support the war’s aims,
were drafted into the military and shipped away to fight. They were
disillusioned from the beginning. This might explain the alternate attitudes
toward the war.
The thought about how they don't only carry the responsibility to their country but also the need to not embarrass themselves in combat by acting cowardly is an interesting point to reflect on, especially the comparison between The Things They Carried and All Quiet because I feel like this point was also clearly made in On The Rainy River. When he talks about how he does not decide to stay in the draft and not fleeing to Canada out of patriotism or bravery but the paralyzing terror of what would be said about him once he did flee. It was more of a motivation to him to not fail than to succeed.
ReplyDelete