In The Complete Maus, Vladek’s trauma from
the Holocaust is passed on to his son, Art. Throughout the book Vladek tells
many stories about the horrors of the war and his struggle to survive. The
stories that he tells give the reader an insight to why Vladek acts the way he
does. The war has conditioned him to hoard things because they might come in
handy later. For example, when Vladek is walking in the streets with Art, he
picks up the wire and says that he can use it for tying things. Art responds by
telling Vladek, “You always pick up trash! Can’t you just buy wire?” Throughout
the novel, the audience sees how aggravated he gets with his father. The story
suggests that Art and Vladek didn’t have a good relationship possibly due to
the fact that Vladek has psychological damage due to the war, which affects how
he interacts with Art. This graphic novel is an effective way to tell a war
story because it’s a war story not told by a survivor but by a survivor’s son.
This novel shows how the traumas of war can be passed on from father to son.
Even though Art didn’t experience the war, he feels the affect of it because of
the stuff his father has to deal with after the war. The guilt that Vladek
feels is something that even Art has to deal with. The struggle Vladek has is
due to the fact that he lost his wife and son and basically the rest of his
family. I really enjoyed this book because it was an interesting way of writing
a war story with a twist.
Great blog post Sarah! I agree that that Vladek has psychological issues remaining from the war. The way he rations out things, and the way he seems so rushed or determined to accomplish chores shows the reader how something happened to him in the war and that is why he acts the way that he does. I also enjoyed reading this book due to the way the story is told, from the son of a survivor. I find it interesting that art chose to put himself in the novel instead of focusing on just his parents and their survival through the Holocaust. It makes me wonder if the story would have had a different effect on the reader had the story been told from Vladek’s point of view.
ReplyDelete